Doral is a warning

The Doral story was a warning to us that we could get stuck with a multi-million dollar cleanup out there if we dont do our due diligence AHEAD of time. Doing it AFTERWARD is not due diligence- it is rolling the dice and hoping. I have a 2004 map of the area and it stipulates VERY CLEARLY that it is NOT to be responsible for showing ALL the possible areas of pollution there. It states that there could be additional sites that are not known as of the date the map was drawn. Just because someone SAYS there are no issues with the areas considered for annexation does NOT mean its true! What are their qualifications for making a statement like that? The prior posts sound pretty official and logical to me. Is somebody saying they are not true? Does ANYBODY have ANY proof to that effect? Or is it just ANOTHER case where somebody says its true because THEY SAY SO. The City Manager frequently takes that approach. Is that you again, Gym? Dr. Mel P. Johnson