Sunday, March 29, 2009
interesting questions
...shouldn-t that "safety" include the safety of our children in a rundown recreation building? Should those without children & or families make decisions & policies for all those have them? These are very interesting questions. Is the one asking these questions ststing that they believe our kids are in imminent danger now? If so, we should close the gym NOW. What dangers, specifically, are the kids in? Is the roof leaking again? We just put a new roof on less than a year ago. Have the contractor back and have him fix it. For 2 million dollars we could have a new roof, new floor, new walls, new sprinkler system, new plumbing and electrical system and air conditioning on the same footprint, with NO NEW DEBT. For an extra million we could probably have a new pool, all with NO NEW DEBT. As far as having those without kids deciding for those WITH kids, someone might ask why those WITH kids should be deciding for those who dont or no longer have kids here, no? As was duly pointed out, what is more important is ones character, vision, and common sense that should be the criteria for a leadership position, no? Dr. Mel P. Johnson
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment