boundaries

VG is supporting MS if we want Area 9, which they dont want and have no prudent claim on anyway. In return for their support for a property they dont want and cant get? all they want is BOTH sides of 36th street? If VG has done their due diligence then why are they pushing MS to move BEFORE we have done ours? has VG considered the mitigation fees? possible pollution? zoning concerns? at last count 9 commissioners arent in favor of annexation? I havent heard ANY of these issues mentioned by the VG people. In return for the valuable (?)support for Area 9 we should support them developing the old Cisco area along 36th street. It makes just as much sense and is just as valuable. In return for OUR valuable support of the Ciscos area all we want is both sides of 36th street. Boundaries are just one of the major issues.