a discussion continues

"when the rec center project was investigated they determined that it was better to build new that fix old." My question here would be WHO decided this, and HOW did they do it? It certainly wasnt discussed in any detail. It WASNT a result of the Pistorino report, which said there were VERY GOOD options available that didnt entail a new gym, footprint, or variances, and for a LOT less money. To have had a town meeting and brought Pistorino in to discuss his findings would have been due diligence. To ignore his report and bury it DEEP is not doing due diligence, as it ISNT looking at ALL the options. To say otherwise does not make it so. Are you saying it WAS thoroughly discussed and debated at some point? If so, when? I would like a copy of the verbatim discussion of that meeting. Perhaps it was done at the ONE Council meeting I missed in the past two years. If so, I would like to catch up on that debate. Thank you for the oppurtunity to explain. Dr. Mel P. Johnson