due dilgence denied, again

The City Manager DID assure the Council that he had PERSONALLY vetted the resume of Mr Giglio, right? any discrepancies would be HIS responsiblity, right? He vouched for Mr Giglio when he pitched him for the job, right? There IS a video record of that, or eyewitnesses, right? Since there was NO other interviews, job search, or advertising done for the job, the Council has gone completely on the word of the City Manager regarding his background, experience, and character, right? Some might say the Council has a lot of confidence in the City Manager. Others might say the Council is being lazy and totally negligent in their oversight duties. Why didnt Mr Giglio come in front of the Council to answer any questions they may have regarding his background, experience, or character? Of course the only one who would have been prepared and asked any substantial questions would have been Mr Dotson, but he never got a chance. Wonder why. Talk about buying sight unseen! for the "most important job in the city?". Where was the DUE DILIGENCE done there?" AGAIN. NONE. Would anybody buy a CAR based only on the salesman's word? Ridiculous. Incredibly irresponsible!