bloviators united

I have no real problem with people spouting facts. I DO have a problem with spouting opinions that have NO basis in fact. If there were any factual numbers that supported their opinion they would have quoted them, but there ARE NONE. They may gain a little credibility if they quoted even ONE reliable source of information, but without any actual numbers those are just bloviating blowhards who give baseless and meaningless opinions, and waste our time reading their unsubstantiated drivel. The pool numbers have NEVER been challenged by ANYBODY who knows pool operations, have they? Is there anybody who disputes the pool numbers presented? If so, lets hear on what factual grounds you dispute them- where are your contradictory figures? Silence. The debate misstatements were from FactCheck.org. The denial of ANY factual association between the Obama campaign and those Fannie and Freddy shysters (along with their history)came from Snopes.com. Both are well known sources of impartial and factually correct information. Are you saying that either one or both of those fact-finding organizations are biased too? The multiple and myriad causes of this economic crisis presented were excerpts from MSNBC, as noted. Oh no!!! Its ALL a conspiracy! The truly telling fact is that there have been NO opposing figures presented. Zip. Zero. NONE. They want others to quote 5 sources while they offer NONE. BS. Is it pure laziness, or perhaps ignorance, a closed mind, or just that they HAVE no reliable facts or figures to offer. You decide.