Billy is CONSISTENT

Billy is CONSISTENT. He has consistently voted for each and every motion that brings his legacy project into being, whether we need it, want it, or can afford it. When Billy says that due diligence was done in deciding on a new gym is he being misleading, disingenuous, or dishonest? Possibly all three? At which meeting was the Pistorino option discussed and debated in any depth or thoroughness? I would like a verbatim recording of THAT discussion, along with the date and time, IF it ever happened. So, while its true that Billy may have NO regrets about any of his votes, the PEOPLE who will have to pay for his LEGACY project do! Dr. Mel P. Johnson

commentary

It is difficult to justify commenting on a person for their height, eye color, etc. as those are the result of the cards Mother Nature has dealt them, and they had no choice in the matter. It is totally another matter to comment on their job performance, job skills (or lack of same), decisions made or not made, management style, or interpersonal skills (or not). It is much easier to justify commenting on a public official when they CHOOSE to be arrogant, petty, vindictive, dishonest, misleading, mendacious, manipulative, obscure, vain, overbearing, secretive, obtuse, egotistical, irresponsible, and/or corrupt. THOSE are CHOICES they make, and they have to live with the consequences.