Wednesday, July 2, 2008

deceit

Is it POSSIBLE that AGAIN we have a contractor who stands to make a LOT of money on the new gym project, cheerleading it? Did he, like the other one, FORGET to mention that little detail in his letter to the Editor of the Gazette? is that illegal? or just unethical? He says he has talked to all sides and came to the conclusion we need a new gym- a gym that will put a LOT of money in his pocket. Duh! He wants us to believe he is unbiased, like the other guy, but he's on record as the winning bid for the plumbing. How can he be unbiased? How do you spell deceptive? Devious? Dishonest?

He accepts the Council members decisions as a reflection of the will of the residents. If that was true the Council would have let the people speak and have their say in the voting booth. That wasnt done as the Mayor rejected that possibility out of hand. He offers his thanks to the Council, as he SHOULD, because their decision will put a LOT of money in his pockets. He looks forward to this project because he has won the plumbing lottery- a city project whose history GUARANTEES 300%, 400% and more profits OVER AND ABOVE his normal 25% profit. Who wouldnt? Its easy money.

Well, the taxpayers and residents who foot those outrageous bills, for one.

And he is unbiased? Please. More deceit, plain and simple. This is becoming a pattern. Illegal? unethical? Dishonest? ALL of the above? Highly irregular? Suspiciously questionable? You decide.

No comments: